Talk:Christin Milloy

infobox

 * the OreS score of article with infobox is "B": 0.04993087111771453,             "C": 0.2683083239341921,              "FA": 0.0024234222931705978,              "GA": 0.016440740198371648,              "Start": 0.6499824076109224,              "Stub": 0.012914234845628854


 * without it is "B": 0.04316719272385977,              "C": 0.200216540617623,              "FA": 0.0022730024668752924,              "GA": 0.011703556097281256,              "Start": 0.7296803064045138,              "Stub": 0.012959401689846791
 * therefore, the infobox is an improvement. Beatley (talk) 19:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Will you please stop with this stupid promotion of ORES as a way to justify infoboxes. The ORES score means only "the article will be longer if we add an infobox". It says nothing about whether the addition will actually be an improvement. See e.g. the same discussions at Talk:Lady Rachel Workman MacRobert and Talk:Marion Parris Smith for more detail about why ORES is such a bad indicator of quality for this purpose. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)