Talk:Christine E. Dickson

Points for Improvement
This article has a lot of solid information and presents it in a clear and concise way along with proper usage of citations and references. However, I think that a lot of what this article needs is updates on information and some of its references. Links to videos and a few of the websites were faulty and pulled up a 404-page or a 505-page. The links that do work are almost 9 years old and should call for more present work done by Dickson, or at least further discussion on how her work as persisted or evolved given time. In terms of the writing within this article, the sections are focused, clear and well-done. The lead is brief, but I think that its simplicity is a means of drawing the reader in to understand more of the basic truths discussed. 192.225.179.227 (talk) 19:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)