Talk:Christine Love (writer)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

I'll make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and drop questions below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Lead has three consecutive sentences beginning with "She..."


 * Last two sentences of lead have "currently in them


 * Add descriptor for Riva Celso in lead


 * " largely unsuccessfully" tried to sell - de-quote.


 *  her first "big" game - de-quote. you mean commercially successful? or...what?


 *  the free game was downloaded by "countless thousands", - I think this is the sort of thing that an independent source would be needed. Also de-quoting and rewording.


 * add descriptor for Gamasutra


 * There are rather alot of direct quotes. I do agree that many are good and add to the prose...but I think if some could be ditched it'd be good.

Interesting read overall. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I've "addressed" your "points", as well as removed/reworded "a bunch of quotes". -- Pres N  01:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:  Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)