Talk:Christology

Nomination for merging of Template:Christology
Template:Christology has been nominated for merging with Template:Jesus. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * the entry seems to be missing? Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  04:49, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Sorry, crossed the dateline but didn't notice. --Bsherr (talk) 04:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Crucificion ?
‘that Jesus was human who was "adopted" by God at his baptism, crucificion, or resurrection.’

What is this word? ‘Crucificion’

And please, please, please stop using the word ‘problematic’ to mean ‘troublesome’, or ‘difficult’ or ‘causing problems’. It is a horrible American misusage for which God will punish them. And you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:E578:A461:8C8C:2F8C (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Crucifiction or Crucifixion? Ericadamslives (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Crucifixion. Looking is dictionaries I see the like of "crucifiction ... Common misspelling of crucifixion." Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 22:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Dyophysitism in the pre-existence of Jesus Christ the Unigenite
The article defines dyophysitism as the belief "Christ maintained two natures, one divine and one human, after the Incarnation". For the pre-existence of Christ, it is wrong. Christ had a twofold human-divine nature even before the Incarnation. The pre-existence of Christ and the dyophysitism are two aspects of a unique Christologic doctrine. It is true at least for a subset of Christians.

For them, Jesus Chist God is believed to be true man and true God from ever and forever: when Jesus Christ God was generated by God the Father before all centuries, He was generated in the male flesh, or equivalently, with a human-divine male Body.

Those who believe in the pre-existence of Christ the Unigenite, also believe that God the Father had from ever and forever a human-divine male flesh. It means that the dyophysite nature doesn't belong uniquely to God the Son, but it is also of God the Father. In the Nicene Creed, they are said to be made of the same substance: that substance are their respective two human-divine bodies and their common bodiless Holy Spirit God. They can be a unique God with two fleshes and divine bodies, thanks to their common bodiless Holy Spirit God. This is the reason why Jesus was alone on the cross and could be resurrected by the other two alive divine persons.

The Paradise hosts two thrones for three divine persons of the Most Holy Trinity.
 * Need and role of the Incarnation

The work of the Holy Spirit God in the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary didn'cause nor create the male flesh of Jesus God, whereas it creates his mortal nature. Cristian Fathers said Crist lost the impassibility of the flesh of God the Father, becoming ortal like any of His human creatures, because Incarnation was order to death on the cross and the human salvation since the beginning of the work of the Holy Spirit God.

Assuming a mortal quality on his pre-existing ehternal and human-divine flesh, Jesus became also capable of experience tears (flevit super illam), pain during the Passio as well as effort (Simon of Cyrene who aided Jesus for the transport of the cross), but also the illness 8ebven if for the latter there is are biblical evidences). Even with those mortal qualities, the Unigenite never ended to be true man and true God, and, being God,  he couldn't and he didn't share with the human creatures the sin, the error and the afterthought.Philosopher81sp (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Divinity of Jesus
Divinity of Jesus currently redirects to this page, but as a hotly debated topic in itself I think it may need a page of its own, separate from other topics discussed on this page such as salvation, etc. There are easily enough sources to meet WP:GNG. Any thoughts? Relinus (talk) 08:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

A mistake concerning the Human/divine person of Christ
Christ is truly human and truly God, thereby 2 natures in one person. But His person is not Divine/human, but only divine.'''A basic Christological teaching is that the person of Jesus Christ is both human and divine. The human and divine natures of Jesus Christ apparently (prosopic) form a duality, as they coexist within one person (hypostasis). There are no direct discussions in the New Testament regarding the dual nature of the Person of Christ as both divine and human.''-Under the rubrique "Person of Christ" OTHEr ARTICLES THAT DENY THE HUMAN PERSON OF CHRIST https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/is-jesus-a-human-person https://www.reasonablefaith.org/question-answer/P70/was-christ-a-divine-human-person Thank you for your attention, may the Lord bless your day. 86.221.145.153 (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)