Talk:Christopher Dillon Bellew

Copyright Violation
This page is an extremely close paraphrase of, enough to be a clear copyright violation. That content is licensed as CC BY-NC, which is not compatible with free use by Wikipedia. Jfire (talk) 02:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree that the there is close paraphrasing. Licensing though is not as clear.  The page does show CC-BY-NC as the license, but the site's terms of use indicate the side it under a CC-BY license.  As such, it's not clear if the material was originally released CC-BY and then the license was changed.  Given that the licenses are nonrevocable, if it was originally CC-BY, then only an attribution needs to be added.  I've lised it for copyright investigation. -- Whpq (talk) 03:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)