Talk:Christopher Marlowe/Archive 2

Says who?
. Says who?Nicholl doesn't say so, and Holland makes clear he's speculating and in regards to Shakespeare, not Marlowe. Shakespeare scholars have gone back and forth on this since 1773, but last I checked the conclusion is that while this is reasonable it is just speculation: there is no evidence that there is any algorithm that can be applied to obtain the date of birth from the baptism. There was no prescribed interval; no typical interval; no "On the first Sunday after…" or similar dynamic interval. Or rather, there were all of those, and more, but applied too inconsistently and variably to be of any use.Not that I disagree with the claim, but we either need to in-text attribute the speculation to someone, or find a middling large boatload of reliable sources to back up our just flat out saying so in Wikipedia's voice. Xover (talk) 10:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The Corpus people says so, p32 and  p22. I'm not saying they represent consensus, but they do say it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * But they ain't cited there, and if they don't have significant company we need to attribute the opinion to them in-text. Xover (talk) 12:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Improvement attempted. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It strikes me that it could be good to add something about known siblings. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2021 (UTC)