Talk:Christopher Mims

Lack of Notability and Insufficient Coverage
The notability of Christopher Mims as a technology columnist is highly questionable if we refer to the general notability guidelines. According to these guidelinse, a topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

Significant coverage refers to detailed and substantial discussions about the topic, addressing it directly without the need for original research. Trivial mentions, on the other hand, fall short of significant coverage. In the case of Christopher Mims, while there is mention of his work as a technology columnist at The Wall Street Journal, the article does not provide evidence of significant coverage from independent sources beyond this affiliation.

Reliable sources are crucial for establishing notability. These sources should possess editorial integrity and allow for verifiable evaluation. They can include published works in various forms and languages. However, the availability of secondary sources is often seen as a good indicator of notability. In the case of Christopher Mims, the article does not provide clear evidence of multiple reliable sources discussing his work, achievements, or contributions as a technology columnist.

Considering these guidelines, the article about Christopher Mims lacks the necessary evidence to establish his notability as a technology columnist. While there is mention of his educational background, previous positions, and personal life, there is limited information about his significant contributions, awards, recognition, or impact in the field of technology journalism.

To meet the notability guidelines, it would be important to provide additional independent sources that discuss and evaluate Christopher Mims' work as a technology columnist. This could include citations of articles, interviews, or publications from reputable sources beyond The Wall Street Journal, Quartz, and MIT Technology Review. Without such evidence, it becomes difficult to ascertain his significance and distinguish him from other journalists in the field.

Considering the guidelines, it is important to compare Christopher Mims' prominence to other notable technology journalists in the industry. Notability guidelines often require individuals to have received attention and coverage beyond their immediate professional circles. However, the article does not highlight Mims' visibility in mainstream media, industry conferences, or other platforms where prominent technology journalists are often recognized. This raises doubts about his notability in comparison to other well-established figures in the field.

Lastly, it is important to evaluate the long-term impact of Christopher Mims' work. Notability guidelines suggest that individuals should have a lasting impact or a substantial body of work that continues to be influential or referenced over time. While the article briefly mentions Mims' coverage of the "converging crises of the 21st century," it does not provide evidence of the lasting impact of his reporting or its significance in shaping public discourse or policy discussions. Without such evidence, it becomes challenging to establish his long-term notability in the field of technology journalism.

To conclude Christopher Mims does not meet any of the criteria outlined for authors, journalists, or creative professionals. There is no substantial evidence to suggest that he is regarded as an important figure or widely cited by peers or successors. He has not originated a significant concept, theory, or technique in his field. Additionally, there is no indication that he has created or co-created a significant or well-known work that has been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. His work has not achieved the level of recognition required, such as being a significant monument, part of a notable exhibition, or represented in the permanent collections of notable galleries or museums.

Thus I request the administrators to review and potentially delete the Christopher Mims page based on the lack of significant coverage from independent sources, absence of notable achievements or contributions in technology journalism, and the failure to demonstrate lasting impact or influence. Deleting the page aligns with Wikipedia's notability guidelines, ensuring the platform's integrity and credibility in providing valuable and noteworthy information to its users. Alexandria Bucephalous (talk) 04:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)


 * tl:dr? Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 01:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)