Talk:Chromatic dragon

Weights?
Where is this weight information coming from? They are way too high (example: 640 TONS for a Red Dragon). They were added by User:72.93.107.103 without explanation or source. Although I like the quality of the article, something appears way off, and may be original research. Turlo Lomon 12:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It is form A practical guide to dragons which is not to be taken to seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.201.39.165 (talk • contribs)

I am concerned about how much of this may or may not be a copywrite variation. Can anyone who has "A Practical Guide to Dragons" verify this? In addition, it will require a full rewrite, due to the inuniverse tone it carries. Turlo Lomon 11:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

just get the weights out of the monstrous (monster) manual —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocobomastr (talk • contribs) 18:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Added deletion tag
Look, this Project should be deleted totally. A videogame should only have one or two pages. Wikipedia is NOT a videogame tricks and cheat page. Info about videogames should not be detailed on Wikipedia. Please leave this D tag until an administrator ,apart from Jeske, checks it.--Zzubiri (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nobody will speedy-delete it based on what you have stated (see WP:CSD). Further, Dungeons and Dragons is not a video game (it may *have* video games, but it is a tabletop game). -Jéské ( Blah  v^_^v ) 18:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Where's the OR?
Doesn't seem to make any sense.CSHunt68 (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)CSHunt68

Requested move
Chromatic dragon (Dungeons & → Chromatic dragon – This article has been the primary article, and only article, for the topic "Chromatic dragon" for a few years. With that rationale, it should be moved to Chromatic dragon, which is currently a redirect to Chromatic dragon (Dungeons & Dragons), but it should be the other way around. Steel1943 (talk) 09:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Support – straightforward move. I doubt there will ever be anything to disambiguate against. —Torchiest talkedits 13:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Support - perfectly reasonable. BOZ (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)