Talk:Chronicles of King Ahasuerus

Tags
Article contains no sources or verification. Furthermore, the contention that this is a "lost book of the Old Testament" would denote that at one point this book was part of the Old Testament or Talmud. This is not supported by any scholarly or archaeological evidence.--Isotope23 17:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I noticed that JChap2007 changed the article in such a way that my accuracy tag is no longer necessary. Sourcing still needs to be provided.--Isotope23 18:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)