Talk:Chrysanthus and Daria

Legendary Saints Were Real, Buried Alive, Study Hints
I just came across this interesting article. Should this be added to the article? Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 19:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saints Chrysanthus and Daria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051129000836/http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintc0n.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintc0n.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Historicity

 * 1) Refs: the same material twice, both not helpful - Nat Geo in English only for subscribers, and in Italian version there's just the heading. Must go on trust - BAD.
 * 2) One-sided: one inaccessible source interpreted by one editor.
 * 3) Tribune at age 17-18? Hard to imagine, want to see academic discussion.
 * 4) No signs for reason of death interpreted as confirmation for suffocation - A. Legend has him drowned, her possibly buried alive, so quite aggressive manhandling for both. If remains only skeletal and no trauma signs visible (arms, neck), many (!) less physically violent death causes would leave even less signs.

Let's say aristocratic young man married away to older woman (up to 7-8 yrs older) is plausible, but those 2 elements (#3 & 4) make the conclusion look very fishy & biased. Arminden (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)