Talk:Chrysaora helvola

species is no longer recognized by WoRMS
i've assumed that this article's been kept due to C. helvola still being recognized as valid by WoRMS despite its doubtful history; however, as of now, this isn't the case as its WoRMS page now lists it as unaccepted and a synonym of C. fuscescens. the only other non-wikimedia taxon identifiers that recognize it as an accepted species are IRMNG, NCBI, open tree, and sealifebase. should this article be kept and simply edited to reflect up-to-date info on it not being an accepted by WoRMS, or should it be deleted/merged with C. fuscescens?Wonderego (talk) 00:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)