Talk:Chrysler 2.2 & 2.5 engine

Turbo IV engine
76.17.61.168, your reversion of my edit was not appropriate, and has been undone. Here's why: My edit replaced unencyclopædic POV text with encyclopædic and descriptive NPOV text, and included a valid wikilink to the technology in question. Variable-nozzle turbochargers significantly reduce turbo lag, but they do not eliminate it. Also, while I have owned and driven many 2.2 & 2.5 turbo cars, including TIV units, my vehicle ownership history is just as irrelevant to this article as yours. It also doesn't make any difference how cool you or I may think the Turbo-IV cars are. Remember, the standard for information in Wikipedia articles is not "truth", but verifiability, and assertions — especially those that can reasonably be challenged — must be supported with citations from reliable sources. It doesn't matter what you or I or anyone else knows or thinks he knows, it matters what we can prove per Wikipedia's requirements. Please try not to take it personally when text you've added to an article is modified as part of an effort to improve the article according to Wikipedia's standards. Please also take a few moments to click the links embedded in this comment to learn more about how to make your contributions more likely to remain part of the article as it evolves and improves with the effort of all who choose to participate. Remember, Wikipedia is a coöperative effort, not a competitive one. --Scheinwerfermann (talk) 04:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)