Talk:ChuChu Rocket!/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 12:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Don't feel obligated but I'm looking for comments on my current peer review if you're interested. Freikorp (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * "lead mice into their rockets" - the use of the word 'their' raises the question of why they have rockets, also it isn't clear at this stage what the rockets do (they could be a weapon to use on the cats), how about simply 'lead mice into escape rockets'? I'm open to alternate wording.
 * I agree that's the best way to say it, fixed
 * Wikilink Private server in the lead
 * Done
 * Wikilink sprites; non-gamers won't know what this means
 * Done
 * "He noted there are two trends" - this is his opinion. As per WP:WORDS i'd replace "noted" with "stated" or another neutral term
 * I am bad about doing that, fixed
 * Wikilink Wii U
 * Done
 * "hook up 4 Game Boy Advances" - '4' should be spelt out as 'four'
 * Done
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * There's inconsistency in the references. I.e some publications are spelt out (PlanetDreamcast) whereas others are given with the url (www.dreamcastlive.net, sega.jp). Replace the url formatted ones.
 * Fixed url ones
 * I'd format 'ChuChu Rocket! credits. Sega, 1999' with Template:Cite video game
 * Done
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * There's one [citation needed] tag. Obviously the preceding sentence needs to be cited or removed.
 * I cannot find a source. I think the image stands fine on its own to explain this. Removed.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Looks pretty good overall. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Responded TarkusAB talk 16:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Happy for this to pass now. Freikorp (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)