Talk:Chu (state)

Language
any information on the languages spoken and how it differed from states further north? How would they have pronounced the name of their state? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.102.65 (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Although this question has been here for a long time, but...I just added a language section. The Chu language shows a predominantly Tai-Kadai influence. The rulers of Chu probably spoke a variety of Old Chinese being on its way to merge with non-Sinitic languages, which are believed to be chiefly Tai-Kadai. Gustmeister (talk) 10:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * See below. — Llywelyn II   02:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chen (state) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't see how this would merge with the Chu page, unless the state literally has no history, in which case a mention of it's annexation would just occur on the Chu page.
 * It is a Zhou vassal state, it's annexation would appear to be it's only connection to Chu. FourLights (talk) 22:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Chu (state)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Chu (state)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "map": From Wulipu:  From G55 Erenhot–Guangzhou Expressway:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

The inclusion of the states of Wu, Yue and Tai-Kadai in the see also links
User Thomasettaei have continuously deleted links to the states of Wu, Yue and Tai-Kadai in the see also section. This user claims that: Where are the regulations that these silly words based on ?
 * Quality articles at most usually include one or two links
 * See also is not a mandatory section

If there are, then I wouldn't proceed in undoing this user's edit. Otherwise, I would have to put the links to the states of Wu, Yue and Tai-Kadai in the see also section.

Here are some featured articles with more than six links in the see also, , ,.

The populations of the states of Chu, Wu, and Yue are related. Therefore, links to these states are needed. Gustmeister (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * per MOS:NOTSEEALSO: "the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes". Many of the links you added are already linked in the article. -Zanhe (talk) 18:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the link. Is Thomasettaei a different account of yours? Gustmeister (talk) 19:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, but this article is on my watch list. -Zanhe (talk) 19:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth you were right and they were wrong. Aside from, —despite being a great editor for Chinese articles generally—grossly overstates the  policy. It's to avoid unhelpful ing but in this case it's helpful for  to be able to quickly get to the southern quasi-Chinese Zhou state Yue and Wu articles in relation to Chu. Instead, the policy would activate and be correctly applied to remove mostly unhelpful links to other random Zhou polities like Qin or Lu. Something like that—listing all of the Zhou states—would be better handled by an infobox at the bottom of the page instead.


 * If there already is one that does include Yue and Wu already (like there is now) that is the reason Yue and Wu don't also need to be in the #See also section. The links are already clearly available in the same area of the article for the curious. (The current Zhou state template seems like it could be better organized—in particular to separate those southern not-quite-Chinese-yet ones—but that's a separate issue to be handled on the template's talk page.) — Llywelyn II   02:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

identity issues

 * Chu (state), Qin (state), Yan (state)

It is illustrated in the sources provided that these three states were frequently called "barbarian" by those in the Central Plains. Whether this view is caused by genuine difference in ethnic identity or just snobbery should be addressed. Why are they removed or toned down without any discussion? 42.61.172.8 (talk) 15:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Sources for future article expansion
Especially for the known info on Shang-era relations to Chu, seems to have some pretty helpful info. Interested editors should kindly add it in when they've got time. — Llywelyn II   02:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)