Talk:Chu XP-0

Edit Warring Over Aircraft Designation
The history of this aircraft seems to be very little documented. However, that does not negate the need for reliable sources. The history page of this article reveals some light edit warring over the exact designation of this aircraft. Please explain the reason for your changes in this regard with reliable sources when making them. –Noha307 (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


 * When I Google X-PO I get a lot about the aircraft, when I google XP-O I get this page and nothing more, so I assume X-PO is correct. - ZLEA  Talk Contribs 18:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Lennart Andersson's A History of Chinese Aviation ( lists on p. 243 what appears to be the same type as the XP-0 (0, not O) - noting that the prototype that flew (and crashed) at Kumming in 1943 was the XP-1 which appears to be a different aircraft (with inverted gull wing) than the "more conventional" XP-0, of which 9 were built (2 in 44, 2 in 45 and 5 in 1946).Nigel Ish (talk) 22:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Good, a non-internet source is better than an internet source in my opinion. - ZLEA  Talk \ Contribs 23:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)