Talk:Chuck Knipp

Why do we need two pages?
Why does Shirley Q. Liquor need a separate page? What is so pressing about that character that it can't be explained here, seeing that I can't even find Chuck Knipp's birthday, or a fair use photo we could use of him WITHOUT his makeup on?

Also, I'm still working on the criticisms and the defenses of Shirley Q. Liquor and Charles Knipp. I know the three criticisms, for example, don't represent the definitive say in anything; what I'm trying to do is avoid critiquing from blogs and get criticism and praise directly from online newspapers and news sites. 172.162.115.189 14:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Time to combine the two. --24.21.105.29 (talk) 05:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism
It should be noted that some one from the ip address 74.140.220.237 has vandalized this page. The most offensive vandalism is where the vandal rewrote a quote from a young black woman in the following manner (words that were altered have been placed within dashes):

"-paint- his face black and -get- rich off spewing hurtful and embarrassing stereotypes about Black women...Knipp -bees- free to celebrate"

The other edits were rewriting of quotes and unsubstantiated claims. I have undid all of this individuals edits on this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbusta (talk • contribs) 16:18, July 18, 2007

This article does not know the definition of the word tryst. I would suggest escapade or just adventure as replacements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.20.53 (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

BIRTHDAY
WANA GET THAT INFO IF ANYONE KNOWS BE BOLD AND ADD IT THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.100.173 (talk) 06:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Religion categories
I've removed Category:Ministers of religion &  Category:American Episcopalians from the article. There's no support in the article for either of these - I would expect to see, at least, the Ministers of religion explained. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Knipp is a minister in the Quaker religion. That may be the reason someone posted that in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.226.142 (talk) 23:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

BLP issues
I was close to speedying this article as a gross BLP violation. A huge amount of the content was badly or not at all cited. Please don't readd anything unless it's properly cited. Stifle (talk) 13:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I see. Thanks for pointing out BLP - I have no actual interest in this article, I just came across it (and realized it'd been blanked repeatedly) because I followed an IP history link from my watchlist.. I'll be sure to check the citations next time I reverse any vandalism. :)  • Gli k tch •   (Talk)   14:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Knipp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928013529/http://www.rupaul.com/news/2002/11/these-folks-is-just-plain-ignunt-last.shtml to http://www.rupaul.com/news/2002/11/these-folks-is-just-plain-ignunt-last.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)