Talk:Chuck Versus Agent X/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  01:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * The talkpage needs Wikiprojects
 * Done.
 * The plot section is largely confusing to me (a non-Chuck watcher). Not sure if this can be fixed enough for non-viewers to comprehend, but I recommend giving it a slight rewrite
 * The episode itself was largely confusing, even for a hardcore viewer like me, but the summary is not quite chronological, especially in the first few paragraphs. It's only 372 or so words, so I'll work on it later.
 * I edited the plot and I think it's just about as detailed as it can get to be clear to non-Chuck viewers without going over on detail (or word count).
 * In the lead you say a character "makes a life-changing discovery" from a laptop, but the plot is unclear on this (it just says "spy will")
 * I tweaked the plot summary in the lead, because it wasn't true to the episode's actual plot.
 * Indicate Jeffster! is a band
 * Done
 * Too many "also"s and "revealed"s in production
 * I removed an "also" and changed a few "revealed"s. Tell me if there are still too many.
 * I recommend combining music and cultural ref sections (combine under "Music and cultural references" heading)
 * Done.
 * Websites are not italicize (i.e. TV by the Numbers (add wikilink also)). Also, Den of Geek is three words.
 * Done.
 * Sentences ending in quotes need a citation directly after period (mostly in reception section)
 * Done.
 * Ref 9 needs accessdate
 * Done; I was missing a bit of code in the ref.
 * Either italicize all Chucks and other TV shows in ref titles, or none of them
 * The only "Chuck"s italicized are the ones that were italicized in the titles of the original websites.
 * I recommend still italicizing all of them for consistency's sake (see Lost episodes for examples, if needed)  R uby2010   comment!  15:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I'll place the review on hold for seven days while everything gets sorted. Please reply here when your edits are finished, as I will not be watching the article page. Thanks and good luck,  R uby2010   comment!  02:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. --Boycool (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks great! Pass for GA. Nice work,  R uby2010   comment!  03:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks you very much! --Boycool (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)