Talk:Chuckanut Formation

Proposed work.
I am thinking of adding a short section on the geology. However, I am rather strongly opposed to "handcrafted" markup of citations, preferring use of the 'citation' (or even 'cite') templates, and would convert all of the citations in the article for consistency. Anyone have any objections to that?

I also prefer Harvard referencing, but for a short article like this I can go either way. Anyone have any preferences?

And I would trim lead paragraph, perhaps droping the latter half into the section on fossils. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Sounds like a good move, I have no objections to the changes, and apologize for the citation formatting present now, I did not have a good working knowledge of the citation template when I worked on expanding the article.--Kevmin (talk) 19:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Just finished a major revamp and augmentation. I merged the previous "Fossil trackways" section with material from the original lead paragraph because they were small; the current "Fossils" section could use more material. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I have added a link to "On the Trail of Washington Dinosaurs", an article in Washington Geology that has a good picture (fig. 6) of a fossil trackway. If anyone wants to get that picture contact me for assistance. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)