Talk:Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BencherliteTalk 21:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Review
Preliminaries: no dab links, no broken external links.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I made a few minor alterations and delinked a few common words, but otherwise it's good enough for GA
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Offline and Bulgarian-language sources accepted in good faith (I ran one through Google Translate and got the gist at least!)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It would be nice to know when the church stopped being used as a church and when it started to become an art gallery, but not essential for GA status
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Personally, I wouldn't have all three images in the lead section as it were, but would have at least one in one or more of the lower sections to space them out a bit.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Good work. Well done. BencherliteTalk 22:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)