Talk:Churel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Articleye (talk · contribs) 13:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The article meets all criteria of a good article except criterion 3a. The article does not address key aspects of the concept. For example, when did the concept originate in Hinduism? How did it evolve over the centuries? Has it crossed-over and become a part of Muslim cultures? Is the concept known only in India or does it exist in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, etc.? Three types are mentioned but the focus is almost entirely on "Soshi". The other two are not discussed in depth. What does science have to say about the phenomenon - has there been any scientific research at all or not? Any examples of particular cases in the form of folk stories? The article needs to be expanded substantially to include these points and possibly more before it can pass criterion 3a.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: