Talk:Chuxiongosaurus

moved from article
Commentary moved from article:

"The above statement is so funny, particularly the sentence: Identified from the holotype CMY LT9401 a nearly complete skull (including a lower jaw) with some similarities to Thecodontosaurus, it was described as the "first basal sauropod dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of China," more basal than Anchisaurus. The fact is this: the skull and the lower jaw were collected by two different persons at two different times from two different localities. Furthermore, they have different museum specimen numbers.

"

[added by User:Dinodragon] J. Spencer (talk) 23:41, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

From the same user I moved this later commentary:

"Please see the following photo showing the skull and the lower jaw were collected by two persons on two different times at two different sites. How can this be the same animal?"

This is a very valid point and it shows our source was possibly wrong. However, we need some other published source to correct it!--MWAK (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * CXPMrecordCIMG1722.JPG