Talk:Chyabrung

Regarding chyabrung
Chyabrung is a traditional drum of limbu people. It is different from other kirat. You only claim to put rai but rest of all the writings is about Limbus. You did not read any of the books properly. Ask any rai people in nepal about the drums they will say it is dhol. it is far different from Limbus. Risingsun121 (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Please check rai people page too. In sakela they call it dhol which is different to limbu chyabrung. Risingsun121 (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Why are you keep asking me to provide enough source ? I already put 5 of them. the source has mentioned chyabrung is of limbus. And why do you think it is rai' s chyabrung ? you should also provide some source to prove it. Risingsun121 (talk) 17:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Most of the source you mentioned are only of the local nepal newspapers and nepali community online forums. Risingsun121 (talk) 17:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Dear Risingsun121, Kindly add reliable credible sources to your edits. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources. I am not voicing my personal opinon. If you 'read any of the books properly' kinldy cite them.
 * Kind Regards. --Tabletop123 (talk) 17:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your sources also mention that chyabrung traditonal Limbus drums Risingsun121 (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Dear Risingsun121, Once again kindly cite the books your read or credible websites to your claims. Kindly add reliable credible sources to your edits. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources.


 * Regards--Tabletop123 (talk) 17:43, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

User Risingsun121 keeps reverting the 'Chyabrung' page to what he thinks is correct without solid references. User copy pastes material into the article and 'references it to itself' i.e the references he puts are a hyperlink to what he pastes. User uses confrontationl language instead of trying to resolve.

Please advise. --Tabletop123 (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

User Tabletop123 has falsely assisted me of his own mistake and is reverting all my edits from this and other pages too. I hope administrators, please check our edits. Risingsun121 (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry *accused Risingsun121 (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I am not sure how you can post such a message. You accuse another editor of posting content "without solid references", yet you have posted a whole load of content not supported by any references at all. Risingsun121 has posted sources, as for example, which you have then removed on the grounds that Risingsun121 "does not cite sources properly", and you have left no source at all for the content in question. How is having no source at all better than having one which is not cited correctly? Or wouldn't it be better still to change the citation so that it is cited properly? Also, not one of Risingsun121's edits to the article "references it to itself", as you claim above. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)