Talk:Cibak language

Merge to Kibaku language
This should be merged to Kibaku language, as the first written dictionary of the language uses the term "Kibaku (Chibok)" --Djembayz (talk) 13:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Disagree. Wikipedia uses common English usage.  Both Ethnologue (following ISO 639-3) and Glottolog use Cibak as does the great majority of literature on Afroasiatic languages.  --Taivo (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmmn, if that's what you're spotting in the general literature, then let's go with that instead. Shall we merge to Cibak for now? --Djembayz (talk) 13:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. (I don't know how to merge other than cut and paste).  About half of the Kibaku article is irrelevant for linguistics, however.  --Taivo (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)