Talk:Cicada/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Atsme (talk · contribs) 11:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking on this review. I have made the two alterations currently suggested above. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. The article was a pleasure to read.  Nicely done!!   Atsme 📞📧 10:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Many thanks from me, too. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * And me! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Major errors
It seems that the review did not look into contemporary reliable sources to identify gaps or quality of referencing. Some of the errors pointed out in the talk page are rather severe. Perhaps the editors would like to give it a more careful examination. I have added a few which I fixed. Shyamal (talk) 13:00, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Cicadas claimed as mostly nocturnal - not at all correct
 * Cicadas claimed not to stridulate - not true
 * Not so major - already fixed. If you see any other errors, you are free to contribute to improving the article.  A GA review is not the same as a FA review. Atsme 📞📧 20:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)