Talk:Cicely Saunders

Evangelized?
I read a story in a source other than wikipedia, that stated that Dame Saunders was influenced by C.S. Lewis in England, and the story implied that that is one reason she became a Christian. Does anyone know if that is true? L. Thomas W.
 * It is mentioned here that her thinking was influenced by C S Lewis, Olive Wyon, Teilhard du Chardin and Viktor Frankl, and by 14th century English mystic, Julian of Norwich, but that does not confirm the story: A symposium on the life and work of Cicely Saunders. The first video, a lecture given by Martina Holder-Franz goes into the question of her growing religiosity.--Terry Patterson (talk) 15:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Doctor and Dame?
Dame Saunders was a doctor, shouldn't this be mentioned in her titles? Oliver Keenan 12:56, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that the title Doctor is superseded by Dame so you wouldn't use both --Vince 20:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * But she qualified as a doctor in 1957, so there is a period before damehood that Miss became Doctor. I have often seen Dr included in combination with other titles, I do not know the rules of how this works! --149.254.200.218 (talk) 18:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

She was also social worker after she studyed nursing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.98.136.45 (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It would not be Dame Saunders. It would be Dame Cicely or Dame Cicely Saunders.--Terry Patterson (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * On mixing academic and titular ranks, you do find things like Professor Sir Martyn Poliakoff; the Academic rank comes first.--Terry Patterson (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Kaybeesquared (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

During her working life at the Hospice she was simply known as 'Doctor Saunders'. She was the clinical director. I was employed as clinical nurse researcher there.

Knighthood?
Is there another term when a woman is made a dame? --Daniel C. Boyer 21:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Not as far as I am aware --Vince 20:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

yes there is — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.160.115.226 (talk) 15:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Why both "the dying" and "the terminally ill"? What's the difference?
I'll answer my own question, but if when I do it seems like needlessly mincing hair-splitting, please with that in mind review the statement in the lead in which the two terms are used and consider editing out one or the other.

The obvious answer to my own question might be that the terminally ill are a sub-set of the dying, a group which also includes the mortally wounded or some such. I mean, someone who's been hit by a bus or shot or some such aren't normally thought of as "ill," so much as "fatally wounded" or some such. So maybe I understand the point made by using both terms.

But if "the dying" encompasses the terminally ill, to say "...the dying and the terminally ill..." is a bit like saying "...geometric shapes and triangles..."; which would be a strange thing to say. Am I missing something, or shouldn't we edit out "...and the terminally ill...? Chrisrus (talk) 04:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, the referent of this article? GREATEST. HUMAN. EVER. Chrisrus (talk) 04:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

I prefer 'terminally ill' to 'dying'...seems this page is making the same mistake as those responsible for the hideous Liverpool Care Pathway....how 'terminally ill ' was Rusty Lee's mother we all ask. Sincerely doubt Cicely would have approved of 'the dying'...she had a very clear idea of what she was trying to achieve with palliative care, and it certainly wasn't clearing bed blockers or expensive to care for dementia patients out of NHS beds. 79.75.208.160 (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)twl79.75.208.160 (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

One of Doctor Saunders' key views was that the medical profession, of which she was part, refused to accept people were 'dying' especially in the main medical teaching hospitals. Research explaining this innovation has been added added to the section on the hospice Kaybeesquared (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Her husband was Polish
Wasn't her husband Polish? This it not well clarified in the article. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 14:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Religious Views
It would seem appropriate to include something about Saunders' religious views as I understand them to be an integral part of her methodology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.233.222.253 (talk) 16:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cicely Saunders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140325191214/http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/14885/ to http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/14885

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quotation cited was biblical?
2 Corinthians 4:16 That is why we never give up. Though our bodies are dying, our inner strength in the Lord is growing every day. Copyright Biblegateway quoted TBV.

Which version of the Bible did Dr Saunders refer to or use regularly? Kaybeesquared (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Kaybeesquared (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Kaybeesquared (talk) 22:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Added category palliative care