Talk:Cinematic style of Christopher Nolan

Is "Cinematic style of Christopher Nolan" a good enough name for the article?
Since this article is more comprehensive than just a description of this "style" (although that is a broad term), I'm wondering if this should change name to something like "Filmmaking of Christopher Nolan"? Sections like "Views on the film industry", "Influences" and "Method" supplement interesting information on how Nolan works, how he views filmmaking and technology, and thus it is both encyclopedic and vital in the context to how Nolan forms his cinematic approach, or style.

What do you guys think? 185.176.244.95 (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm wondering why this article exists at all. There're no articles on the Cinematic Style of Stanley Kubrick/Spielberg/Scorsese/Hitchcock/Antonioni, or anybody else for that matter. What makes Nolan so special that this information can't simply be folded into his main page, or similar pages for filmmakers with equal - or even more - 'points on the board'?Robbmonster (talk) 08:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * What kind of argumentation is this? Feel free to make them, Robbmonster, Wikipedia would be better for it. It is separated due to the size of the article(s), per Wikipedia's guidance. And how is it Nolan's fault that Speilberg's article isn't up to snuff or thorough? Several other filmmakers with these kind of pages, look at Rivette or Kiarostami.185.176.244.95 (talk) 13:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

'Cinematic style' is a very broad description, I think the name of the article is solid. And there is no need to adress Robbmonster's concerns any further. Sammyjankis88 (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Frequent collaborators
Does anyone else think it's silly to have everyone who worked with Nolan only twice to be in the table? It seems that giving an actor a second chance isn't proof of some special connection or ongoing relationship. A lot of other tables go 3+ and I think that's a better idea. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree, twice shouldn't be considered "frequent". InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

On comedies
Ser what you can add:. Finding the right place and paraphrasing are not my strong points. Kailash29792 (talk)  12:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)