Talk:Cisco Meraki

Reasons for Notability
Jrincayc 19:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Meraki was mentioned elsewhere in Wikipedia prior to the creation of this article (in the San Francisco Municipal Wireless and the Linksys WRT54G series article.
 * They are one of the few (only?) companies that are producing the hardware and software that can be used to easily set up adhoc mesh networks.

Recommend for Deletion
This is a purely self-serving commercial posting and should be removed. Claims for uniqueness are overstated. 71.6.14.105 00:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Disagree. Feel free to edit parts of the page that you think are purely self-serving. However, I believe that their hardware and software are very unique.  If you disagree with that please provide other examples of similar hardware and software.  Thank you. Jrincayc 03:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Taking no position on whether the article should live or die, what has uniqueness got to do with it? Notability seems to say nothing about that.  Jim.henderson 04:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I think it is notable as well based on the number of independent articles. Jrincayc 03:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I was misdirected to this page while searching for the meaning of the special greek word "Meraki". So this page is misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.153.217.230 (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Competitors/open source equivalents
Why no mention of open-mesh.com? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.112.63 (talk) 19:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah.. Open-Mesh article was deleted. By a single person, apparently as not notable. That's weird - I'm sure I'm not the only one who wants to read about open source alternatives to Meraki.


 * I agree that Open-Mesh should be considered notable. Jrincayc (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've asked the deleting admin to restore it, maybe someone else can voice some support as well.. riffic (talk) 12:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Criticism section
... appears to be largely the work of WP:SPA editor User:Patro-claus, who appears to be here solely to promote Tanaza. The claims made in this criticism section are largely not supported by WP:RS. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Agree. I have deleted the whole section. --Edcolins (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * There should be some criticism section for their 'network disable' feature that enforces the cloud controller license. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.64.242 (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Merak - Meraki = doing something with soul, creativity, love, passion? Undo the redirect Comment
We have a problem. There is a confusion. Meraki redirects to "Cisco Meraki", where Meraki is a "thing". I'm here because I got an invitation to to an exhibit "Meraki" - and I thought - hey, I know that - that's strange what's written here - let me look that up on the wikipedia, because, actually I thought it was the name for a people - the "Meraki people" somewhere in a mountainous region in Greece - ok, so I understand I've been fooled by my Greek friends. Now I found out: "meraki, μεράκ - [may-rah-kee], (adjective): This is a word that modern Greeks often use to describe doing something with soul, creativity, or love -- when you put "something of yourself" into what you're doing, whatever it may be.", "The Greek word Meraki means to do something with passion, from the heart, with absolute devotion, with undivided attention; a labour of love,", "Meraki, a verb, or adverb, a Modern Greek word, derived from the Turkish “Merak” (Labor of love, to do something with pleasure), is applied to tasks, usually, creative or artistic tasks, but can be applied to any task at all. Meraki means to do something with passion, with absolute devotion, with undivided attention.", ... . We really need help on this, so I've asked help from the https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:merak - Thy, --SvenAERTS (talk) 09:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Well spotted. I have just converted Meraki to a proper disambiguation page which should cover all those issues — to be expanded, of course. --Zac67 (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)