Talk:Cision Inc.

Merger proposal
I propose that Cision Inc. be merged into Cision. Confusingly, the two articles contain a hat note which indicate that the two entities should not be confused but I believe they are the same company. The first is older than the second; I have no strong opinions on which should be merged into which but I believe we generally do not include "INC." In the title which is why I proposed the order that I listed. See also Talk:Cision.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  18:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Cision
Article does not make clear the distinction between Cision and Cision Inc. Andrew327 11:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Given the significant amounts of overlap (the infoboxes for example effectively cover the same entities), I see no reason that the company should be covered in separate "pre-merger" and "post-merger" articles. Meets WP:OVERLAP. Guliolopez (talk) 09:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)