Talk:Citizen's Briefing Book/Archive 1

Enlighten bad requests
Hello, I move here the sentence :
 * "Popular recommendations included ending the prohibition on marijuana use in the United States and the legalization of online poker."

First : is here a source for that ? Second: I guess that in such websites, we also get request such as "please increase the number of camel in USA", "Please tell us what happen in 1947, at Roswell", ...

Should we put such request in the article introduction ? I don't think so, that's certainly not representative of the book, these too request are on the extrem side of naivity. Yug (talk)  13:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, it seems there are sources for this 2 statements. Stay that they shouldn't be enlighten in the introduction : they are not representative. Yug (talk)  13:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As you acknowledge, the information is sourced to multiple sources later in the article. Please note from WP:LEAD: The lead serves both as an introduction to the article below and as a short, independent summary of the important aspects of the article's topic. The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. Cirt (talk) 17:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In addition, there is now yet another citation to back up this information, sourced to Reuters, as published in San Diego Union Tribune. Cirt (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Update
An update on what's going on with the Citizen's Briefing Book: = not an WP:RS, but hopefully more info will come out about this in additional secondary sources, and also more developments. Cirt (talk) 09:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Passed as GA quality article
This article had a GA review, and was successfully passed as a WP:GA quality article. The review is at Talk:Citizen's Briefing Book/GA1. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Citizen's Briefing Book. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090810203443/http://www.observer.com:80/mobile/article/81394 to http://www.observer.com/mobile/article/81394

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)