Talk:CitizenCard

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... this was a useful redirect when I created it in 2010, and it will still be one now until its more extensive article is ready for mainspace - David Gerard (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The deletion was requested because Draft:CitizenCard is ready to take its place. I don't know why the note to that effect wasn't visible on the delete request. Thanks, LaMona (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Redirect replaced
There is a Draft:Citizencard at AfC that has been declined multiple times. This current article (CitizenCard) was a redirect to Proof of Age Standards Scheme. Then this redirect became over-written with the current article. The declined draft is considerably more ample than this article, with many more references. (That doesn't mean it's better, I'm just making a comparison.) The draft version was moved to mainspace (e.g. here) on 4 March (here), then was moved back again on 5 March after being first marked for speedy deletion for advertising (here), then was declined again at AfC. Now this version appears from presumably an entirely different editor. I'll ping some of the reviewers who were involved: User:SwisterTwister, User:Sphilbrick, User:333-blue, User:DGG, User:Graeme Bartlett. The question is whether we should do something with the draft, and whether this article is one that would pass review, or should be PROD'd for the same reasons that the draft article was declined (and twice nominated for deletion)? Thanks, LaMona (talk) 04:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I removed some promotionalism from the new article and I think it is now satisfactory. I will check whether there's anything additional in the draft that should be moved to the new article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with Draft:Citizencard, and most likely that not all contents have to be merged because there are some promotional contents.  333-blue  07:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CitizenCard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151029102618/https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news-and-appeals/Pages/New-Proof-of-Age.aspx to https://www.cityoflondon.police.uk/news-and-appeals/Pages/New-Proof-of-Age.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Written like an advert?
You that the article contains content that is written like an advert. Which bits? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)