Talk:Citizens' Battle Against Corruption

Fair use rationale for Image:Cibac-logo.gif
Image:Cibac-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 16 September 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus. A reasonable case has been made not to move. Jenks24 (talk) 00:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Citizens' Battle Against Corruption → CIBAC – WP:CONCISE & WP:COMMONNAME. The short name is used more frequently. Same with Lakas-CMD. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 12:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment if the full-out name is used alot as well, then the full out name should be used as our article title, same as how Central Intelligence Agency uses the full out name, even though CIA is extremely common; the acronyms are opaque, so unless they are overwhelmingly dominant and the full-out names are little used, the full-out names should be used instead. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 06:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The acronym hasn't been recognized by non-Filipinos. --George Ho (talk) 23:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.