Talk:Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI

Untitled
Is there some reason that the wikifying template is here on this article? There is no justification on the talk page, as you can see, and it seems like a pretty decent stub to me. I deleted the "history" heading, since all the content was under that heading (so it was unnecessary). Perhaps this is what the template was for. If that's the case, whoever added it should have just been bold, like me, instead of adding an ugly template. I'm going to remove this template, and add the stub template. If someone still thinks this article is not "wiki" enough, that person is encouraged to change it themself. - Torgo 04:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The link to the LA Times article no longer works. It should be replaced / updated.


 * Looks like the LA Times link is fixed. PS Is the neutrality of this article still disputed? What part? -Danspalding (talk) 06:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Fictional movie referenced as fact
Steal This Movie, while a historical docu-drama, is not verbatim history. Thus, this article has been stamped with NPOV until an editor can fix the citations on this article. 71.199.104.170 (talk) 07:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

I second the question of whether this article is in dispute, since it hasn't been modified since 2008. I'd agree that it's not the most unbiased account of a little-known but significant incident. But I don't know of any public (irony) records debating the importance of uncovering the FBI's program of domestic surveillance of the Left. Illegally uncovering these documents led to the FBI being chastised in the US Senate. There is more to this story, and I suppose I (or someone) could edit it for a more neutral style, but I don't see any dispute here in the talk page.

So I'm going to boldly remove the "dispute" tag. Let me know if we need more discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accordion Noir (talk • contribs) 20:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Why merge?
Just saw the merger recommendation on COINTELPRO. Doesn't seem necessary to me, although both pages should certainly link to each other. groupuscule (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Democracy Now!
There is a consensus, established at WP:RSN that Democracy Now! is not reliable, except possibly for quoted statements. It shouldn't be used as a source here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Historical Marker to be dedicated September 1, 2021
According to a paywalled article that I didn't completely read before it shur down at there will br a Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission historical marker unveiled at 4 pm on Sept. 1, 2021. As I understand it this is open to the public withou tickets ans several (?) of the original participants will attend and/or speak. At 4:45 pm there wiill be a free, but ticketed/registration required book signing and inside site-tour with the WaPo reporter who wrote the 1st story and the recent book. I'm going to try getting various photos if possible. Somehow this strikes me as something many Wikipedians might like to attend, Smallbones( smalltalk ) 14:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Better listing of events Smallbones( smalltalk ) 23:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)