Talk:Citizens United v. FEC/Archive 2

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Citizens United v. FEC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100208213605/http://www.counterpunch.org/brauchli02042010.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/brauchli02042010.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100130002609/http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTVkODZiM2M0ODEzOGQ3MTMwYzgzYjNmODBiMzQzZjk%3D to http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTVkODZiM2M0ODEzOGQ3MTMwYzgzYjNmODBiMzQzZjk%3D
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100209114159/http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTk4OTA4YzlkMDg5ZmQyMWQ3OTFiZjM4OWIxMmYxNGI%3D to http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTk4OTA4YzlkMDg5ZmQyMWQ3OTFiZjM4OWIxMmYxNGI%3D
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205054509/http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2010/02/constructive-criticism-presidential.php to http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2010/02/constructive-criticism-presidential.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100124104330/http://iowaindependent.com/26145/boswell-pushes-constitutional-amendment-to-overturn-scotus-ruling to http://iowaindependent.com/26145/boswell-pushes-constitutional-amendment-to-overturn-scotus-ruling
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100131210323/http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=52d6486c-802a-23ad-4fb5-e34d8249a594 to http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=52d6486c-802a-23ad-4fb5-e34d8249a594
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100126093231/http://www.counterpunch.org/nader01222010.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/nader01222010.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307135239/http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/november10/Comment_7328.php to http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/november10/Comment_7328.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727220907/http://www.campaignfreedom.org/docLib/20100304_CCPpoll03042010.pdf to http://www.campaignfreedom.org/docLib/20100304_CCPpoll03042010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Updates to Opinion Polls
There have been opinion polls conducted much more recently than the one included in the article. For instance there was an Ipsos poll conducted in August of 2017 (link here: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/center-for-public-integrity-2017-08-31) which found that 48% of Americans opposed the decision and 30% were in favor. I think this poll should certainly be added, but I would like other people's opinions on whether we should keep the old poll data. Is it really relevant to include poll data which is nearly 10 years old in the article?

Thanks, DiscoStu42 (talk) 04:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Broken Link leading to 404 error
Currently, the 10th citation leads to a 404 error and is not functional. ( Carney, Eliza (2010-01-21). "Court Unlikely To Stop With Citizens United". National Journal. Retrieved 2010-01-21.) https://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/rg_20100121_2456.php

Sorry if I made any mistakes. I didn't have much time to look up the etiquette or sign up. 76.14.115.35 (talk) 20:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Philip M

Old Poll Data
Is there a reason that this article contains so much outdated polling? Many of the polls included are nearly 10 years old. If nobody objects, I will remove some of the older polling. DiscoStu42 (talk) 07:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)