Talk:Citroën C3 Picasso

C3 Picasso Advertisements
Found one more in French here but i need a translator...ツ Je no va  20  (email) 08:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There's a man in a car...
 * (Car/SatNav) "In 50 metres turn left"
 * (Voice over) "Fancy a full-equipped car? Splash out on [a model from] the Citroen C3 Picasso Hdi collection. Note that we have slashed the VAT rate to zero percent, meaning you'll save EUR4,580".
 * Screen at the end shows it has bluetooth, panoramic windscreen and climate control, lists the amount saved (EUR4,580) and something about the 110 Fap.
 * Handily translated by User:DracoEssentialis. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 15:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

There's another which uses "augmented reality" too ツ Je no va  20  (email) 10:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Need to find out how to change the colour of sections inside tables...ツ Je no va  20  (email) 09:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Trnava production in the Sales Figures table is only ever available with the Peugeot 207 included so i may just remove the entire column to make it easier. ツ Je no va  20  (email) 15:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC) ✅ ツ Je no va   20  (email) 11:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Aircross

 * One advert on Youtube ツ Je no va  20  (email) 10:50, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Decent review for the Aircross here ツ Je no va  20  (email) 17:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Engine specifications
As european car this should have metric horsepower also, the torque is also written not as in convention says  lbf·ft >lb·ft, the table also says hp when the actual figures are now bhp. Here is proposition to new table, the whole article is bit Britain centric. "The Spanish market received only three different trims to choose from: a 95 bhp 1.4 L VTi Attraction, a 120 bhp 1.6 L VTi Seduction and 1.6 L VTi Exclusive (with the same engine as the Seduction model).[23]  The reference link does not work so I cant check if Spanish model has bhp power figures advertised -- >Typ932 T&middot;C 10:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * This stuff is a bit technical for me as i'm crap with engines. So i welcome your help in this area.
 * If that link is dead then that poses a problem as i had very little on the Spanish market and now have even less...The engine table should be useful for you on that issue though? And also the missing two columns of this table here are a bit challenging for me even with the links at my disposal... Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 16:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review
Peer review/Citroën C3 Picasso/archive1 ツ Je no va  20  (email) 14:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Peer review/Citroën C3 Picasso/archive2 ツ Je no va  20  (email) 09:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Split discussion
The article is now within 5,500 bytes of being 100k, making it a perfect candidate for a Size split. The C3 Aircross is not another trim, it's a very similar vehicle and the easiest thing to split. The C3 Picasso is an MPV, while the Aircross is an SUV or 4x4. With the new model section increasing in size over the next months as it is released then it is imperative the C3 Aircross is split. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 13:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Support  There's seldom a cut and dried right or wrong answer on these things.   It's down to judgement.   But as the sub-entry on the C3 Aircross builds, the case for giving it its own wiki-entry becomes ever less resistable.   Success  Charles01 (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Support The Aircross seems like a natural place to split, being a well defined vehicle in its own right.  Stepho  talk 01:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and done it. And it looks very nice. Thanks for the support guys ツ Je no va  20  (email) 10:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

UK sales/registration statistics
I have been asked to comment on the UK sales figures. See here for some background. The question is, which figures should be included in the 'Sales' section? My own view, expressed at the Ref Desk, is that the UK figures from the DVLA are not sufficiently accurate, but that moreover there is no particular reason to include UK figures rather than any others. Thoughts? - Cucumber Mike (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * To be honest it's probably simpler for me to just delete the UK figures. They only seemed relevant because i could find them anyway. And they're only 10% of the total sales at most. Good luck trying to get others to contribute here, check the article history =P Opinions? Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 16:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I had an attack of boldness and removed the UK figures. Whilst I was at it, I took out the 2012 figures until there is a figure for the whole year, since the first time I looked it confused me as to why they suddenly only sold half as many as in the previous year. Whaddya think? - Cucumber Mike (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The reference was still needed for sales and/or production figures so i had to restore it. Other than that you did nice work. I was a bit miffed at not being able to source 2012 figures yet and so i agree it's better to not have half a year included. Thanks Mike ツ Je no va  20  (email) 09:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I just knew I was going to mess it up somewhere, so well done for spotting it! Glad you agree on 2012 - I think it works better now, and we can always add it in once numbers are available.
 * Since I'm here now, and am relatively interested in the subject, what's next on your to-do list for the article? I don't get enough practice editing real articles - I tend to spend most of my WikiTime at the RefDesk - but I'd be interested in helping out here if I can. What's the plan? - Cucumber Mike (talk) 19:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Well it's a common car but a low traffic article. The new model has just been released, but as yet doesn't have enough models sold and reviewed to finish off the mpg and table. I've got it to Good status and had 2 peer reviews, which have for the most part left me scratching my head in some areas. The links to them are on this page or you can just suggest changes/additions or even do them yourself. What do you think? Thanks for the assistance ツ Je no va   20  (email) 09:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Conjecture, Original Research
The article is FULL of unsourced conjecture and original research, both big no-no's.842U (talk) 11:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)