Talk:City Lights/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 01:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Will review it in the next couple of days. -- smaro jit  HD 01:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Excellent, excellent work on one of the best films of all-time. Just some minor issues before I pass this:
 * Release, reception and legecy
 * No in-line citation for "..he demanded higher ticket prices compared to talkies."
 * Same for this review: "On the other hand, Alexander Bakshy of The Nation was highly critical of City Lights, objecting to the silent format and over-sentimentality and describing it as "Chaplin's feeblest"."
 * Finally this: "Chaplin's original "Tramp" suit from the film was donated by him to the Museum of Natural history of Los Angeles County." [Also, why is this statement in this particular section?]

-- smaro jit  HD 04:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

✅. The section is reception and legacy and it seems appropriate to mention him donating the suit in the legacy of the film at the end?♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

-- smaro jit  HD 14:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: