Talk:Civil confinement

Merger proposal
These two articles are covering the same thing and I suggest they be merged. deisenbe (talk) 11:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Deisenbe, and which article title do you suggest we use? Keep WP:Common name in mind. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Since you reverted my renaming the one article I have nothing further to contribute at this time. deisenbe (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I gave valid reasoning for reverting your move of that article. And that move should have no bearing on this merge discussion, but we both know how upset you get when I revert you and give you valid reasoning for reverting you. Your merge tag can remain for years. Instead, I will see about removing it after two months. Of course, you could simply start a WP:RfC on whether or not the articles should be merged or a WP:Requested moves discussion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Support merge with Sexually violent predator laws, suggesting that Civil confinement would be the better target. Both articles cover the same topic, and there is only one outcome: that of civil confinement. The laws leading to that outcome could really be covered under that heading. Klbrain (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)