Talk:Civilian-based defense

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civilian-based defense. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160522051753/http://pbogdonoff.home.igc.org/cbdhist.html to http://pbogdonoff.home.igc.org/cbdhist.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

merge with social defence
Both articles describe the same concept, but from two perspectives. This article "Civilian-based defense" uses Anglo-american terminology, while "social defense" is a verbatim translation of the continental European - eg German - name. I suggest to merge the non-duplicate content from "social defense" into this article and then it a redirect. --h-stt !?  17:42, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * That seems like a reasonable proposal, so perhaps merge to Civilian-based defense but base the article primarily on the content/structure at Social defence. The problem with the current Civilian-based defense page is that it seems primarily an exposition of Gene Sharp's views. Klbrain (talk) 09:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Support 's recommendation. Daask (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Content
To some idea or concept be at Wikipedia it needs wide acceptance and notability since this is not a soapbox or advocacy forum or a promotional tool. Not about someone rising question or support something, I removed some arguing and also one claim about Lithuania, to something being recognized also need wide recognition to it is really like that. For example Lithuania has a total defense concept with strong military pillar not just civilian based defense or so. I understand that some people wish so much for their concepts to be approved or implemented, but Wikipedia is not a place for advocacy of any kind. 109.93.55.169 (talk) 04:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Exclusive local knowledge as a defense strategy
This article could include a section on the use of exclusive local knowledge as a defense strategy Daask (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Kūlgrinda in Lithuania
 * The removal of street signs during the Russian invasion of Ukraine