Talk:Clackline Refractory

largely untouched
The article says which doesn't read quite right to me. "Largely untouched" seems to contradict "thousands of tonnes ... mined". I presume what the article means is "barely scratched the surface of" or "barely made a dent in" but such expressions are too informal. Any suggestions? Mitch Ames (talk) 13:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we could quote the source directly; then the article could say something like


 * - Evad37 &#91;talk] 05:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The word "reportedly" (and thus also the comma) is superfluous if you're quoting, but otherwise that would work. Mitch Ames (talk) 06:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅, without reportedly - Evad37 &#91;talk] 07:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)