Talk:Clarence Mill

Assessments
Self aassessment|Added some more.--ClemRutter (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I think C class is fair enough. I'm not sure about the importance rating; mid is probably fair as one of the best surviving examples of a Cheshire mill? I don't know anything about the specific topic here, but I'd say to improve towards B class:

Hope this helps in developing the article! Espresso Addict (talk) 00:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * the lead needs improvement to cover the article fully; mention it's grade II listed and within the canal conservation area
 * location section appears unnecessary; why include the distance to Manchester, in particular?
 * history section is unreferenced and needs some copy edits; what is the relevance of the other mills mentioned? Some of the material under owners could be incorporated here
 * architecture could do with clarification of which buildings are still standing; ones that are no longer in existence should probably be under history. I'd suggest splitting external architecture from the machinery housed
 * reference 10 is unlikely to be considered reliable and further sources should be sought

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Clarence Mill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100129083218/http://www.spinningtheweb.org.uk:80/ to http://www.spinningtheweb.org.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)