Talk:Clarissa Dickson Wright

Delia Smith
'she moved to television in a series which was allegedly a response to, and parody of, those made by another celebrity chef, Delia Smith.' I find this very hard to believe. Don't parodies require some kind of obvious similarity to the thing they are parodying? Delia Smith's programmes and 'two fat ladies' have pretty much nothing in common.

Clarissa Theresa Philomena Aileen Mary Josephine Agnes Elsie Trilby Louise Esmerelda Dickson-Wright
Uh. Is that *really* her name, or is there a vandal among us? I can't find a supporting reference besides the IMDB (which is user-edited) and Wikipedia mirrors. Parents have certainly done worse things to their children. Vashti 17:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

According to this transcription of her Desert Island Discs Interview, it's correct. --Eine 18:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I undertook the transcription hosted at direct from a recording of BBC R4's Desert Island Discs (transmitted 03 Sept 1999), as part of a university project studying the history of cookery books. I have listened again to the original and can vouch that Sue Lawley does indeed give this as Clarissa's full name, albeit in the context of "The lady... who rejoices or suffers in the name of...". It is worth noting however that Clarissa's entry on the England & Wales Birth Index found at Ancestry UK only states 'Dickson-Wright, Clarissa'. Whether this was for brevity or not I don't know! --Fishingcat 01:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

In an interview on Radio 5 Live Simon Mayo Programme on 6th September 2007 she confirmed that this was her name. Trilby, she said, was the nickname of an aunt of hers.

According to the autobiog

Clarissa (a book in her parents' library) Theresa (Saint of Avila) Philomena (her mother's fav saint) Aileen (for her mother) Mary (as a Catholic child) Josephine Agnes ('two rich relatices who did not remember me in their wills') Elsie Trilby (for my grandmother) Louise (for the cook) Esmerelda ('for my father's favourite pig as I was born in the Chinese year of that animal')

Great stuff

The Eye Of Sauron 07:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I see that Fishingcat has hyphenated her surname in the above post, Dickson-Wright, yet I see no hyphens in the whole article. Is the hyphen correct or did Fishingcat type it unconsciously?


 * ("Esmerelda, for my father's favourite pig. . ." Funny parents: great stuff indeed!) Wordreader (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Surname
Her birth is recorded on the Wright page of the indexes - which transcribe the birth certificate. Her name was Wright, not Dickson-Wright. Typical of the half-truths that pervade her rather tragic story.Sebmelmoth (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)



Scottish?
I am puzzled by Clarissa being classified as Scottish seeing as she was born and seems to have spent much of her live in England? However, I do not know much about her. I have refined the category to Scottish TV chef but would be interested to hear whether this is appropriate. --Vince 19:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

IS this one the dark haired one with the glasses or the light haired one?

On thr above radio interview she referred to her self as an ex-patriate Scot.
 * I think she has Scottish ancestry, but she has been born, brought up and lived most of her life in England. --UpDown 07:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think she has Scottish ancestry (except some "Scots Irish": Ulster Protestant), though her grandparents did live in Scotland for a while. She comes across as completely English. Ausseagull (talk) 06:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Controversy
For starters phrases like "BTW beware the 3RR", is totally uncalled for. I have been on Wikipedia some time and am well aware of it. To be honest it sounds like a threat, and I'd sooner you didn't threaten me. However, to the point. I don't know whether you have a POV, but its seeming like you do. Where's the controvesy - you have invented it. She has been taken, via private prosecution, to a magistrates court on a hunting charge. It received a very small amount of media attention. What is contraversial - nothing. This does not warrant its own section, to do so invents the serious of it, pretends there was a contravesy. This, I think, is your POV. Each section should cover a major part of her life, not one small private prosecution with little media attention. It needs to be merged with the main text, which I will do when I am able under 3RR. --UpDown 06:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally I feel the 3RR comment is harmless although perhaps poorly worded. There is no way someone can know if you're aware of the 3RR and informing people there is a 3RR before they break it is usually considered good practice. Nil Einne 07:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but to be honest a quick look at my edit history would show how long I've been on Wikipedia. It sounded very much to me like the user saying, "Ive got it my way and you can't change it or I'll have you blocked".--UpDown 07:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It most certainly wasn't a threat, a threat would be along the lines of 'I'm going to report you' I had no intention of reporting anyone for 3RR and I have never reported anyone for 3RR, so don't get paranoid about my intentions - I apologise for not checking the history of every editor whose edits I change, but I don't really have the time or patience for such things. I do however disagree with you regarding what is and is not controversial, I consider someone breaking the law, to be controversial, and what she supposedly did was hardly driving too fast or an similar minor incident, if you take a look at the Michael Vick article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Vick#Controversies_and_incidents then you will see a huge section on the charges he faces, relating to Dog fighting, this is a similar animal cruelty case, and my edits made this far less prominent. Please get some consensus before removing my edit, because I consider it to be in line with many other wikipedia articles. thanksSennen goroshi 15:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * As it stands there is a cited information here, presented in the wikipedia standard form, please obtain some form of consensus if you wish to change it, and do not turn this into an edit-war. thanksSennen goroshi 19:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but you're wrong. You have turned this into an edit war not me. The article you cite, Michael Vick, is very different, he has numerous arrest and so - its a long list. This is not, this one charge, which I do not consider contraversial, considering the little media attention. Having a whole new section for two sentences, is franky odd in itself. There is no "consensus" for your view of having a whole section for 2 sentences, for one private prosecution. I am going to revert. If you believe its "contraversial" - cite. If you believe two sentences deserve a section rather than being in chronlogical order in a section about her life since coming to fame - cite. You now apparently have a POV, making one private prosecution into a "contravesy". Wikipedia is not the place for this. --UpDown 07:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Why is it that you are always the victim and accuses others of doing edit wars with you? when its actually you UpDown who always course controversy. pease cool down and behave.Zingostar 15:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, I'm reporting you. --UpDown 17:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Third opinion
Hi. :) I've had a look at your conversation and at the history of the article, and it seems to me that the current organization of the article, with the arrest incorporated into the section above it, presents some difficulty. Even if "controversy" is too strong a word for the section, it certainly doesn't seem to fit in as "rise to fame." Given how recent it is, it may develop into a controversy before its over, but it seems appropriate now to either section it off in some way from the material above it&mdash;it could be moved off into a new section neutrally entitled "Criminal prosecution"&mdash;or or to restructure the existing article. For instance, "Alcoholic years" could be retitled "Early years" and the bookstore information moved into it. The "Rise to fame" section might be renamed "Television career", and the material after Absolutely Fabulous moved into a new section with the current criminal charge labeled something like "Recent years". --Moonriddengirl 20:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your input, I was like a 3rd opinion. I've edited similar to your second suggestion. Let me know what you and Sennen goroshi think?--UpDown 20:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * seems fine to me. if this turns into a controversy, then I might consider re-editing it, but only if she is convicted or something equally dramatic happens. so as to avoid this descending into an edit-war, if I feel changes to the article are warranted, instead of jumping in with both feet and editing, I will discuss the edit here and send updown a talk message, so that we can discuss it first. thanks for the opinion moon, thanks for the cooperation and willingness to discuss things updown.Sennen goroshi 13:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Sounds like consensus, then. :) It sounds like you guys have a good plan for further development. Happy editing. :D --Moonriddengirl 13:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks very much Moonriddengirl for your help, and thanks Sennen goroshi for your willingness to discuss. I will watch Dickson Wright's case with interest, and will discuss any changes on here first. --UpDown 18:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

£2.8 million in eight years
How did she manage to get through £2.8m (in 1975 money) in only eight years? Thats about £1000 a day. I'm sure that even in 2008 money, spending £1000 or probably even £100 a day on booze would be fatal. 80.2.192.85 (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe she was buying other people drinks. People with low self esteem and a lot of cash flow tend to do that. Magmagoblin2 (talk) 14:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Nothing says that she spent the money clear on booze. She is known for enjoying good food both before and after, as evidenced in the show. Caviar, foie gras and so on is hardly cheap. 79.102.24.205 (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

I've seen her explain this on TV. She used to hold lavish parties, including hiring yachts and inviting her friends for boozy cruises. Darmot and gilad (talk) 14:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hard to see where £2.8 million came from. Her father left £73,000 and her mother £28,688 according to the National Probate Calendar.Sebmelmoth (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just had a look at the probate calendar after seeing it in the article, and you're completely right- plus, per the National Archive currency converter (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/currency-converter) circa £102,000 in 1975 is equivalent to circa £780,000 in 2017. This just goes to show the problems inherent in taking autobiographical works as accurate, as the writers so often outright obfuscate the truth or innocently repeat family legends that simply aren't accurate- Dickson Wright's autobiography, as mentioned here several times, is very definitely inaccurate in a number of respects1

Prosecution
I am going to remove the section on the charges that were brought against her in September 2007. No news ever appeared of what happended in Court (at least not that I saw or can find). Below is the section, so if we ever find out what happended we can reinsert it.--UpDown (talk) 18:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * "On 25 September 2007, it was confirmed that Clarissa Dickson Wright and the racehorse trainer Sir Mark Prescott were to face charges under the Hunting Act 2004 of allegedly hunting hares with dogs in North Yorkshire in March 2007. The charges arose after a private prosecution by the International Fund for Animal Welfare and the case was due to be brought to Scarborough Magistrates' Court on 9 November 2007. "


 * This seems to be the start of events leading up to the 2009 court case, now reported in the article. Thincat (talk) 17:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I re-added the above bit a few days ago. Can't believe it took 2 years to get to court!--UpDown (talk) 17:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Forenames again
Has anyone got a copy of the autobiography quoted from in 2007 above, so that we could add a reference for the unlikely-looking, but apparently verifiable, string of names? PamD (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * A reliable reference is given already, reference 2.UpDown (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

The autobiography is interesting because of its make-believe nature. Her father was not knighted - easily checked in the London Gazette. She told most of East Lothian that she had had sex with the Duke of Hamilton on the dining table in his house at Archerfield as she planned to be the next Duchess. In "Spilling the Beans" there are 14 references in the index to the Duke but at the point where such events are likely to be recorded, the editors have removed paragraphs so the index points to missing material. The Duke was very clear that the table would not have taken her weight, let alone the two of them, and he was, reasonably, revolted by her. Her birth was not registered with that daft list of names, some of which belong to her sister Heather. She may have been christened with those names - as various obits record. Her birth registrations shows her as plain Clarissa Dickson-Wright and that is the name used in her various bankruptcies in the London Gazette (although some of those do start on the longer string.Sebmelmoth (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)==File:Clarissa Dickson Wright.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion==

Call date
According to the Telegraph obituary she was called to the Bar in 1970, which depending on which call would have made her 22 or 23 at the time - not by any means the youngest called, even at that date. Apart from her own claim, which is what all the press sources are apparently based on, is the call date evidenced elsewhere? Jsmith1000 (talk) 15:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Many of the claims in her 2007 autobiography Spilling the Beans have been questioned, notably her statement that she had sex with an MP behind the Speaker's Chair in the House of Commons. It's not unusual for alcoholics to be fantasists, and her difficult childhood may be a factor too. The truth will probably never be known. --Ef80 (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Dates of call are easily established, however. Eustachiusz (talk) 00:43, 9 July 2016
 * This continues to be confusing and contradictory. We currently say: "After school, Wright studied for the Bar at Gray's Inn, while pursuing a law degree at University College London"; and then that "At the age of 21, Dickson Wright passed her Bar exams and became England's youngest barrister." For the first sentence, we cite her BBC bio, which says that she "went to University College London to study law and was called to the bar aged 21" (i.e. in 1968–9); and for the second sentence, her Telegraph obit, which in fact does not make either the "aged 21" or "youngest" claims, but rather says that she "did a Law degree externally at London ... and was called to the Bar by Gray's Inn in 1970". Other sources include this 2009 Telegraph interview, which says that "at 21, having already graduated from UCL, she became the youngest woman ever to be called to the bar"; and a post-death account by her agent (apparently drawing on her autobiography), which claims that she "read law at UCL ... and became the youngest woman barrister ever to enter the Courts of Gray's Inn". Whatever the correct date, it's likely that her degree preceded her pupillage and call to the bar, so I'm doing some reworking to fit the evidence to hand. GrindtXX (talk) 22:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Open All Hours
This article could give information if it mentioned how Clarissa Dickson Wright plugged Open All Hours when the BBC had a poll for the nation's favourite sitcom. I am not sure whether it should go in the section headed "Career" or the section headed "Later years". Vorbee (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarissa Dickson Wright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070807213003/http://www.waitrose.com/food/celebritiesandarticles/writersandcritics/0001064.aspx to http://www.waitrose.com/food/celebritiesandarticles/writersandcritics/0001064.aspx
 * Added tag to http://uk.news.yahoo.com/skynews/20070925/tuk-top-tv-chef-facing-court-over-hare-c-45dbed5.htmlm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarissa Dickson Wright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140317213222/http://www.wggb.com/2014/03/17/two-fat-ladies-chef-clarissa-dickson-wright-dies-at-66/ to http://www.wggb.com/2014/03/17/two-fat-ladies-chef-clarissa-dickson-wright-dies-at-66/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Australian?
In one of the TFL shows, Clarissa led off with ‘My mother was AW-stralian, which means that if you have a picnic, you must have a fire…’ True. But why then associate her mother with Singapore? 124.150.79.224 (talk) 09:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)