Talk:Clarkson Cup

Article's biasy
It seems that the article gives the trophy the same calibre as the stanley cup when in fact the trophy has not been awarded for two years and is in no way about to be awarded again. It seems this trophy is defunct., and did not acheive its intended purpose. There is too much merit in this article given to the trophy.

Personally I think the article should be renamed into a broader theme of womans hockey chamionships and a new articel called the clarkson cup changed as a stub., that is until it is no longer a defunct trophy and actually awarded. Perhaps the article can be cleaned up a touch what are the thoughts out there? Jgale061 (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)