Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ  -US 04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ  -US 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

GA Toolbox
I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.


 * Peer review tool
 * WP:LEAD - guidelines suggests 1-2 paragraphs for the lead. This has 3, I would move paragraph up to the first paragraph and combine them.
 * Done.


 * I would put one of the four pictures at the top of the article and scatter the other three through out instead of having a gallery at the bottom.
 * Personally, I think they do better in their own section, since they're not really about any specific aspect of Class A Wild Trout Waters, just general pictures showing what they can look like. I did learn several months ago that galleries aren't inherently forbidden,or even discouraged. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * One thing that would help is a picture by the lead, just something visual to pull people in. How about a trout picture?  MPJ  -US 15:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Found one! --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  17:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Copyright violations Tool
 * It is only indicating some overlapping titles that really cannot be reworded such as "Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission"


 * Disambiguation links
 * No issues ✅


 * External links
 * No issues ✅

Well Written

 * "The first streams were designated as Class A Wild Trout Waters in 1983." should be reworded - how about something like "The first streams received their Class A Wild Trout Waters designations in 1983."
 * Done.


 * "At this time" should be "At the time"
 * Changed to "At that time".


 * "heavily-fished" should be "heavily fished"
 * Done.


 * "has, due to "'social' concerns", become hesitant to classify streams as Class A Wild Trout Waters." should be reordered "has become hesitant to classify streams as Class A Wild Trout Waters due to "'social' concerns""
 * Done.


 * "trout, since" does not need a comma
 * Done.


 * "for propagation" should be "for the propagation"
 * Done.


 * "stocked with trout, prior" does not need a comma
 * Done.


 * "and 62 Class A Wild Trout Waters" i feel like it is missing something?
 * Fixed.

Sources/verifiable

 * Reference 8 needs more info on the book
 * What more information is needed? There's already the agency that created it, the URL, the title, the date, and the page number. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Looking at the Google book link I cannot see any other data that can be added.  MPJ  -US 02:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Broad in coverage

 * It covers all aspects of the topic I believe. ✅

Neutral

 * yes ✅

Stable

 * No issues ✅

Illustrated / Images

 * All appropriatly licensed. ✅


 * - review complete. It is a fairly short article, but is just over the size of what i would expect as a minimum. Putting the review on hold for 7 days to allow for updates to be made.  MPJ  -US 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for picking up the review. I'm aware it is solidly on the short side, but I did feel it covered all the details one would expect to find. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - you are welcome, I agree it covers the main areas so while it's short it's not too short.  MPJ  -US 15:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * - Looking at it now, I believe it's a GA - short and sweet I guess. Congratulations.  MPJ  -US 02:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)