Talk:Classical liberalism/to do

SFinside 15:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The POV dispute needs to be resolved. From what I can gather the dispute is over the relationship between classical liberalism and libertarianism. Unless this issue can be resolved here, it will require arbitration.
 * The article needs copyediting. Nevertheless, it doesn't make much sense to do so until the POV dispute is resolved, since continual changing of the content and the tone of the article will make it impossible to produce a good copy.
 * A sentence in the first paragraph reads, "As such, it is seen as the fusion of economic liberalism with political liberalism," citing the source: Adams, Ian, Political Ideology Today. Manchester University Press. 2001. p. 20. What Political Ideology Today actually says is that classical liberalism is seen as the fusion of economic conservatism with political liberalism. This is so important, as economic-conservatism is essentially what distinguishes classical-liberalism from contemporary liberalism. The persistence of the false claim about Political Ideology Today casts into doubt every word of this article.
 * Say what?
 * If that was over your head, you might try reading comic books instead of Encyclopedias?


 * I just changed Economic liberalism to economic conservatism since the distinction is an important one and no one seems to have provided a counterargument to SFinside or whoever posted the original comment - there, can we delete this box now? Xmacro 04:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)