Talk:Classicide/Archive 1

Should this term really be on Wikipedia?
The only sources that I can see for "classicide" and imply that the term is "not a part of the popular lexicon" and not in standard dictionaries. They also all seem to be implying that this term is only applicable to Maoist China and Stalinist USSR, which may imply a political bias as well. – Zumoarirodoka (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Editing
I am in a group for school and we are going to be editing this page to expand it and hopefully improve it so let me know if there’s anything you want to add! Islandgirl01 (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Islandgirl01 (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

"Elimination of lower classes" section
I was unable to find any mention of the word "classicide" or the concept of classicide in the sources cited in the "Elimination of lower classes" section of the article and it seems to be original research. I was not able to locate the source to verify the reference "University of California, San Diego (2001) "El Salvador elections and events 1902-1932". If no verifiable sources are produced, this section should be deleted from the article. AmateurEditor (talk) 15:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I removed the section as original research. AmateurEditor (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

28 Million Really?
Whoever wrote that section in, I know it says citation needed, but that's a serious statement on my part. Nazi Germany kills 6 million jews, and Germany and Poland is littered with mass grave sites. Even countries with dictatorships, with numbers like that, you can find those remains, like with Pol Pot. 28 Million people, even in China, you can't just hide under the roads. By Citation, I wouldn't want some random book that says that this happens, this will need some serious detailing of evidence. You can't kill 28 million people and not leave a major mark. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.98.78 (talk) 23:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)