Talk:Clathrus columnatus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 02:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Cool! Just mention the duh-ishly obvious epithet columnatus... and we be ready :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Etymology added. Gratias maximas tibi ago! Sasata (talk) 04:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Ad-glay o-tay elp-hay! May we mycobox him...I'm old and forgot (44 is a summer chicken!) Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Now mycomorphed. Sasata (talk) 05:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Clathrus columnatus passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: