Talk:Claudio Naranjo

Untitled
The homepage given was not coming up on the day I tried it (july 8, 2004) Oska 12:47, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

The "mood congruence of thought"--thats quite a concept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.207.47 (talk) 19:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's just the idea that our emotional state affects our cognitive ability. 24.125.133.143 (talk) 00:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The sentence, "But the development of safer 'soul medicines' to deepen and optimise our emotional repertoire promises to enrich human life in decades to come," didn't seem very neutral to me. 24.125.133.143 (talk) 00:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claudio Naranjo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101003132052/http://www.rosepress.com/healing.html to http://www.rosepress.com/healing.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Disputed
The article casts the subject as the "principle developer" of the Enneagram of Personality, not mentioning that Oscar Ichazo was the originator, nor the court cases which established this. Subject was likely a plagiarist, and the court cases may have established this, though I am not certain about that. Skyerise (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I knew Claudio rather well and worked for / with him from 1997 to 2011. I once asked him about this very issue. He responded that he had, like everyone else, signed an agreement to not teach the enneagram. Then at some point wrote Oscar a letter asking for permission to teach. I asked what was Oscar´s response. Claudio said he didn´t answer and I took that as a yea. Mysticsmick (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

While I have fixed the immediate issue outlined above, I am leaving the tag due to the lack of footnotes for much of the article. When these are either provided for verification or the material is removed, I will remove the disputed tag. As it stands, most of the stated facts are unverified so it is impossible to know whether they are undisputed. Skyerise (talk) 16:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC)