Talk:Clavaria fragilis/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Another soul sista! Two things:
 * In History and tax, sentence "Though it is a later synonym, the latter name is still frequently used today."; does that suggest that its late-ness should typically result in less frequent use of the synonym?
 * In Conserv. status, clarify what is meant by "unimproved grassland". Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Done and done! Sasata (talk) 06:07, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * La pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Clavaria fragilis passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: