Talk:Clay-with-Flints

[Untitled]
"it was argued that the general principle of that engagement was contingent on the prior realization of its particular object, which had failed, and the treaty had determined as a special contract; moreover, none of the additional treaties to embody the general principle had been negotiated, and Great Britain had not even offered co-operation in the protection and neutrality guarantee of the Panama railway built in 1850-1855, so that her rights had lapsed; certain engagements of the treaty she had violated, and therefore the whole treaty was void," Huh! This clearly is not meant to be here. Any thoughts?

Rename to Clay-with-flints
No need for caps. Geopersona (talk) 18:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC)