Talk:Cleostratus

Boyd8420 (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Untitled
There is little to work with when trying to understand who or when something was invented. In this case the star arguement and arrangement seems to be credited to Cleostratus. This view held by Dr. Forthingham only really has weight because of the limited amount of material evidence and the constant problem of translations.This reoccuring theme in the Historical study of the Sciences, has both Greek and Latin translations which could conflict with the already small amount of source material. The fact that this figure Cleostratus is at least (almost) a contempary of Thales, means not only historical reverence but also has an idea of continuation of old and possibly unprovable myths of real men. Myths transcending history. see E.J. Webb.Boyd8420 (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cleostratus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060430233625/http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/0812.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/0812.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)