Talk:Clevedon Court/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 12:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: two found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Found and tagged another dead link. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I could only find one tagged deadlink - which I have fixed.&mdash; Rod talk 21:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Generally well written. Could the Interior section be expanded slightly. Perhaps some idea of the layout?Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) ✅
 * Expanded.&mdash; Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * "causing national scandal" - I think this would read better as "causing a national scandal". Jezhotwells (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC ) ✅
 * Changed&mdash; Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * ref #3 Annual Archæological Review 2001–2002" - I can find nothing there that supports "but the evidence, based on excavations to the South of the house in 1961/62, is now known to be uncertain.". Perhaps I missed it? Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) ✅
 * I've reworded this as I agree the claim is not fully supported but this seems to be the only reference to Roman remains - its not in more recent sources so I have left the word speculation.&mdash; Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ref #13 "Mary Elton Primary School". - There is nothing there to confirm that the school was named after this Mary Elton.  I am sure that it was named after her, but we need evidence. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) ✅
 * New reference which states this.&mdash; Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * what makes The Gardening website (ref #38), TourUK (ref #24), Britain's Finest (ref #26) and AboutBritain.com (ref #39) reliable sources? Jezhotwells (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC) ✅
 * Removed/replaced&mdash; Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * {http://www.davenapier.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/mayors/history1.htm} is a personal website, not RS Jezhotwells (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC) ✅
 * Replaced&mdash; Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * same for {http://www.leighrayment.com/baronetage/baronetse.htm} Jezhotwells (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC) ✅
 * Replaced&mdash; Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Broad and of suitable length, focussed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV Jezhotwells (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I am worried about the copyright status of File:W Phot c1950.jpg ‎ and File:W Phot c1920.jpg ‎ ands have nomitaed for deletion at commons so that a judgement can be made. Same applies to File:Clevedon Court.jpg Jezhotwells (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Well two have been deleted and the other kept so that is now satsfied. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)✅
 * If necessary I can replace these with other images - however they do help with the historical perspective which isn't really provided by the other pics in the commons cat.&mdash; Rod talk 21:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * All good now, I am happy to promote this. Sorry about the delay before getting back to this, real life intervened. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)